Model accuracy + full history, in public
Our probabilities, measured in public.
We don't sell a betting edge — we sell accurate analysis. So we measure what actually matters for a decision-support tool: how well our fair-value probabilities match real outcomes (calibration), shown below in full. Our earlier +EV-pick experiment is kept underneath as a labeled archive — including the honest finding that the playable market is too thin to beat. Nothing hidden, nothing cherry-picked.
Model calibration
Are our probabilities accurate?
Predicted (avg)
44.9%
Actual win rate
42.6%
Brier score
0.223
lower is better
Base-rate baseline
0.245
beat this = informative
Across 331 settled predictions our fair value said 44.9% on average and 42.6% actually happened — the model's probabilities track real outcomes, and its Brier score beats the base-rate baseline beyond statistical noise — it adds real information. This measures accuracy, not profit: we're a decision-support tool, not a tipster.
Research-phase archive (retired) — our earlier +EV-pick experiment
Below is the full result history from when we tested publishing +EV betting picks. We've since found the playable market for our users (~2 GGL-licensed sportsbooks) is too thin to sustain a betting edge, so we repositioned to analytics. We keep every result here — wins, losses, and the finding itself — because deleting losers is what tipsters do. It is NOT how we measure the tool (see model accuracy above), and it is reported as independent decisions, not per-book rows.
Equity curve · All time
-23.66u cumulative
Each point is a settled pick's contribution to cumulative net profit in stake units. Wins lift the line, losses drop it. No deletions, no smoothing, no cherry-picking.
Last updated:
Track record builds with each settled pick — current depth: n=977.
Lock-in significance threshold: 1500 picks. We publish every result regardless of sample size — the receipts are the product.
Returns · live from the ledger
n=977· early-stage data7-day ROI
−22.7%
165 settled picks
30-day ROI
−1.8%
977 settled picks
All-time ROI
−1.8%
977 settled picks
Longest win run
12
12 settled picks
Longest lose run
22
22 settled picks
Units staked
1341
Profit (u)
−23.66u
Hit rate
41.2%
Avg odds
3.18
Avg CLV vs close
−6.8%
our honest edge metric · n=950 · 13% beat close
Per-sport models
ROI by sport — every model in public.
Each row is the cumulative ROI of every settled pick for that sport. No cherry-picking — losing models are visible too.
Football (Soccer)
n=583 · 34.5% win
−2.5%
Basketball
n=223 · 59.2% win
+12.1%
Baseball
n=166 · 40.4% win
−19.0%
Ice Hockey
n=5 · 60.0% win
+13.0%
Archive note: rows are logged per (match × selection × bookmaker), so the same decision often appears at several books. The honest count is independent decisions, not rows — and most of these book-prices were never playable for a DE user in the first place. Kept in full for transparency.
| Date | Match | Pick | Odds | Stake | Result | Bankroll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-09 | Athletics vs Milwaukee Brewers Baseball | home Betfair | 2.48 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -23.66u |
| 2026-06-09 | Los Angeles Angels vs Houston Astros Baseball | over_9 BetMGM | 1.95 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -22.66u |
| 2026-06-09 | Los Angeles Angels vs Houston Astros Baseball | over_9 Unibet | 1.93 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -21.66u |
| 2026-06-09 | New York Knicks vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | home Matchbook | 1.82 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -20.66u |
| 2026-06-09 | New York Knicks vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | home Betfair | 1.82 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -19.66u |
| 2026-06-09 | New York Knicks vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | away Betfair | 2.18 | 1u | won+1.18u | -18.66u |
| 2026-06-09 | New York Knicks vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | away Smarkets | 2.16 | 1u | won+1.16u | -19.84u |
| 2026-06-09 | Cleveland Guardians vs New York Yankees Baseball | home Betfair | 1.95 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -21.00u |
| 2026-06-09 | Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox Baseball | away William Hill | 1.91 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -20.00u |
| 2026-06-09 | Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox Baseball | away Paddy Power | 1.90 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -19.00u |
| 2026-06-09 | Washington Mystics vs Indiana Fever Basketball | away FanDuel | 1.49 | 1u | won+0.49u | -18.00u |
| 2026-06-09 | Washington Mystics vs Indiana Fever Basketball | home Betfair | 2.88 | 2u | lost-2.00u | -18.49u |
| 2026-06-09 | Washington Mystics vs Indiana Fever Basketball | away Ladbrokes AU | 1.50 | 1u | won+0.50u | -16.49u |
| 2026-06-09 | Washington Mystics vs Indiana Fever Basketball | home Betway | 2.85 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -16.99u |
| 2026-06-09 | Toronto Blue Jays vs Philadelphia Phillies Baseball | over_7.5 Sportsbet AU | 1.98 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -15.99u |
| 2026-06-09 | Washington Mystics vs Indiana Fever Basketball | home DraftKings | 2.85 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -14.99u |
| 2026-06-09 | Washington Mystics vs Indiana Fever Basketball | away Betfair | 1.49 | 1u | won+0.49u | -13.99u |
| 2026-06-09 | Tampa Bay Rays vs Boston Red Sox Baseball | away Betfair | 1.91 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -14.48u |
| 2026-06-09 | Washington Mystics vs Indiana Fever Basketball | over_170.5 DraftKings | 1.95 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -13.48u |
| 2026-06-09 | Toronto Blue Jays vs Philadelphia Phillies Baseball | over_7.5 FanDuel | 2.00 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -12.48u |
| 2026-06-08 | Los Angeles Sparks vs Portland Fire Basketball | away DraftKings | 3.45 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -11.48u |
| 2026-06-08 | Los Angeles Sparks vs Portland Fire Basketball | away Sportsbet AU | 3.40 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -10.48u |
| 2026-06-08 | Los Angeles Sparks vs Portland Fire Basketball | away Unibet | 3.45 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -9.48u |
| 2026-06-08 | Los Angeles Sparks vs Portland Fire Basketball | away FanDuel | 3.40 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -8.48u |
| 2026-06-08 | Los Angeles Sparks vs Portland Fire Basketball | away BetMGM | 3.40 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -7.48u |
| 2026-06-08 | Los Angeles Sparks vs Portland Fire Basketball | away Bovada | 3.40 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -6.48u |
| 2026-06-07 | Texas Rangers vs Cleveland Guardians Baseball | home Betfair | 1.80 | 1u | won+0.80u | -5.48u |
| 2026-06-07 | Toronto Tempo vs Chicago Sky Basketball | away Betfair | 2.26 | 2u | lost-2.00u | -6.28u |
| 2026-06-07 | Toronto Tempo vs Chicago Sky Basketball | over_173.5 Sportsbet AU | 1.92 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -4.28u |
| 2026-06-07 | Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers Baseball | home Betfair | 2.66 | 2u | lost-2.00u | -3.28u |
| 2026-06-07 | Toronto Tempo vs Chicago Sky Basketball | over_173.5 BetMGM | 1.91 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -1.28u |
| 2026-06-07 | Toronto Tempo vs Chicago Sky Basketball | over_173.5 DraftKings | 1.91 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -0.28u |
| 2026-06-07 | Toronto Tempo vs Chicago Sky Basketball | home DraftKings | 1.74 | 1u | won+0.74u | +0.72u |
| 2026-06-07 | Toronto Tempo vs Chicago Sky Basketball | over_173.5 FanDuel | 1.95 | 2u | lost-2.00u | -0.02u |
| 2026-06-07 | Houston Astros vs Athletics Baseball | home Betfair | 2.00 | 1u | lost-1.00u | +1.98u |
| 2026-06-07 | Texas Rangers vs Cleveland Guardians Baseball | over_7.5 FanDuel | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u | +2.98u |
| 2026-06-07 | Toronto Tempo vs Chicago Sky Basketball | home BetMGM | 1.74 | 1u | won+0.74u | +1.98u |
| 2026-06-07 | Texas Rangers vs Cleveland Guardians Baseball | over_7.5 BetMGM | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u | +1.24u |
| 2026-06-07 | Philadelphia Phillies vs Chicago White Sox Baseball | home Betfair | 1.66 | 1u | won+0.66u | +0.24u |
| 2026-06-07 | Toronto Tempo vs Chicago Sky Basketball | home Bovada | 1.74 | 1u | won+0.74u | -0.42u |
| 2026-06-07 | Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers Baseball | home Betway | 3.25 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -1.16u |
| 2026-06-07 | Colorado Rockies vs Milwaukee Brewers Baseball | home Betfair | 3.25 | 1u | lost-1.00u | -0.16u |
| 2026-06-07 | Vegas Golden Knights vs Carolina Hurricanes Ice Hockey | under_5.5 Matchbook | 2.10 | 1u | lost-1.00u | +0.84u |
| 2026-06-07 | Los Angeles Dodgers vs Los Angeles Angels Baseball | away Betfair | 3.90 | 1u | lost-1.00u | +1.84u |
| 2026-06-07 | Vegas Golden Knights vs Carolina Hurricanes Ice Hockey | home Matchbook | 1.99 | 1u | won+0.99u | +2.84u |
| 2026-06-07 | Vegas Golden Knights vs Carolina Hurricanes Ice Hockey | home Smarkets | 1.97 | 1u | won+0.97u | +1.85u |
| 2026-06-07 | New York Liberty vs Indiana Fever Basketball | over_175.5 Betsson | 1.94 | 1u | lost-1.00u | +0.88u |
| 2026-06-07 | Texas Rangers vs Cleveland Guardians Baseball | home Betfair | 1.93 | 1u | lost-1.00u | +1.88u |
| 2026-06-07 | New York Liberty vs Indiana Fever Basketball | over_175.5 DraftKings | 1.95 | 1u | lost-1.00u | +2.88u |
| 2026-06-07 | New York Liberty vs Indiana Fever Basketball | home Betsson | 1.68 | 2u | won+1.36u | +3.88u |
Showing 1–50 of 977 (newest first)
Methodology
How we measure accuracy (calibration + CLV)
Our headline metric is calibration: across our settled predictions, does an outcome we put at probability p actually happen about p of the time? We publish the calibration curve (predicted vs actual) and a Brier score tested against the base-rate baseline, with a statistical-significance gate. It measures accuracy, not profit.
We also show Closing Line Value (CLV) honestly — how our published odds compared to the market's de-vigged close, including when it is negative. Formula: CLV% = (published_odds / closing_odds − 1) × 100
CLV is a transparency receipt from our retired +EV experiment, not a current edge claim: the playable market proved too thin to beat the closing line, so we dropped the profit framing and kept the numbers visible anyway.
Settlement rules
Each pick is settled against one of four outcomes: Won, Lost, Push, or Void.
- Won: Selection correct. Profit = (odds − 1) × stake.
- Lost: Selection incorrect. Profit = −stake (full loss).
- Push: Bet cancelled by bookmaker (e.g. Asian handicap half). Stake refunded. Profit = 0 units.
- Void: Match abandoned or selection suspended. Stake refunded. Profit = 0 units.
The pick_results table is database-enforced append-only — UPDATE and DELETE are blocked at the database level, so a settled result cannot be silently amended or removed after the fact.
All profit/loss figures use the tax-neutral formula. If a jurisdiction-specific adjustment applies it appears in the pick's audit page under “Edge (post-tax).”
Sample-size caveat
Statistical significance in sports betting requires a large sample. The conventional threshold for drawing firm conclusions is ~1,500 settled picks — at that depth, a consistently positive ROI is extremely unlikely to be variance alone.
BetEdge launched in May 2026 with a baseline of ~293 free picks. Every result is published regardless of sample depth — the receipts are the product. The n= · early-stage data chip on the dashboard is the honest signal: “real numbers, but interpret ROI with an appropriate confidence interval.”
Lock-in threshold: 1,500 picks. The chip disappears once that milestone is crossed. We do not cherry-pick which results to show.
FAQ
About the track record
How is ROI calculated?
What is CLV?
Why does the chart show negative returns sometimes?
What counts as a settled pick?
How do I know these numbers aren't cherry-picked?
BetEdge is an analytics and decision-support tool — not a bookmaker and not a tipster service. We don't accept bets or hold funds. For educational and informational purposes only. 18+.