Devig & No-Vig Calculator
Bookmaker odds always imply more than 100% combined probability. The excess is the vig, the book's built-in margin. De-vigging removes it to reveal the market's actual opinion: the fair probability and fair odds of every outcome.
Unlike most free calculators, this one runs four de-vig methods (multiplicative, additive, power and Shin) on 2- and 3-way markets, and shows them side by side. Shin is the bias-corrected method the BetEdge engine applies to Pinnacle's odds to build its fair-value baseline: de-vig a sharp book's line and you get the best public estimate of true probability; compare another book's price against it and the gap is a measured mispricing.
De-vig method
Attributes part of the margin to informed money (concentrated on longshots) and removes it — the bias-corrected method BetEdge's engine uses by default.
Bookmaker overround (vig)
4.81%
| Outcome | Implied % | Fair % | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 47.62% | 45.87% | 2.180 |
| Draw | 29.41% | 27.87% | 3.588 |
| Away | 27.78% | 26.26% | 3.808 |
All methods compared: fair odds
| Outcome | Shin | Multiplicative | Power | Additive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home | 2.180 | 2.201 | 2.173 | 2.173 |
| Draw | 3.588 | 3.563 | 3.597 | 3.596 |
| Away | 3.808 | 3.773 | 3.819 | 3.820 |
The proportional (multiplicative) method over-prices longshots; Shin, power and additive each correct that bias differently. Where they disagree most is exactly where a “phantom edge” can hide.
How to use the No-Vig Calculator
- 1
Choose the market type: 2-way (tennis, totals, spreads) or 3-way (football 1X2).
- 2
Enter the decimal odds for every outcome of the SAME market at the SAME bookmaker.
- 3
Pick a de-vig method (Shin (default), multiplicative, power or additive) or read the 'all methods compared' table to see where they disagree.
- 4
Read the overround (the book's margin) and the de-vigged fair probability and fair odds per outcome.
Worked examples
Example 1: the standard -110 / -110 line
Both sides at decimal 1.91: implied probability 52.4% each, summing to 104.8%. The 4.8% excess is the vig. De-vigged, each side is exactly 50%, fair odds 2.00. You are paying 1.91 for something worth 2.00; that gap is the cost of betting random sides.
Example 2: football 1X2
Home 2.10, Draw 3.40, Away 3.60: implied 47.6% + 29.4% + 27.8% = 104.8%. Proportional de-vig gives fair probabilities of roughly 45.4% / 28.1% / 26.5% and fair odds of 2.20 / 3.56 / 3.77. If another book offers the home side at 2.25 while the fair price is 2.20, that 2.3% gap is the kind of mispricing our edge screen flags.
The four de-vig methods
The proportional (multiplicative) method is the standard reference, but it systematically over-prices longshots (the favorite-longshot bias) which manufactures phantom edges on deep underdogs. The other three correct that bias in different ways. When they disagree on an outcome, that's exactly where a “value” bet is most likely to be a bias artefact rather than a real mispricing.
Shin
Attributes part of the margin to informed money (concentrated on longshots) and removes it — the bias-corrected method BetEdge's engine uses by default.
Multiplicative
The standard reference: scale every implied probability down in proportion until they sum to 100%. Simple, but over-prices longshots.
Power
Raises each implied probability to a single exponent until they sum to 100% — shrinks longshots harder, correcting the favorite-longshot bias.
Additive
Removes an equal absolute share of the margin from each outcome. Takes a bigger relative bite out of longshots than the multiplicative method.
FAQ
Devig Calculator FAQ
What is vig (juice / overround)?
How does the no-vig (de-vig) calculation work?
Which de-vig method should I use: multiplicative, additive, power or Shin?
Why de-vig Pinnacle's odds specifically?
What can I do with the fair odds?
BetEdge is an analytics and decision-support tool, not a bookmaker and not a tipster service. We don't accept bets or hold funds. For educational and informational purposes only. 18+.