Model accuracy + full history, in public
Our probabilities, measured in public.
We don't sell a betting edge — we sell accurate analysis. So we measure what actually matters for a decision-support tool: how well our fair-value probabilities match real outcomes (calibration), shown below in full. Our earlier +EV-pick experiment is kept underneath as a labeled archive — including the honest finding that the playable market is too thin to beat. Nothing hidden, nothing cherry-picked.
Model calibration
Are our probabilities accurate?
Predicted (avg)
45.6%
Actual win rate
43.1%
Brier score
0.220
lower is better
Base-rate baseline
0.245
beat this = informative
Across 501 settled win/loss predictions (counted once per match-market, pushes & voids excluded — so this is smaller than the total settled-pick count) our fair value said 45.6% on average and 43.1% actually happened — the model's probabilities track real outcomes, and its Brier score beats the base-rate baseline beyond statistical noise — it adds real information. This measures accuracy, not profit: we're a decision-support tool, not a tipster.
Research-phase archive (retired) — our earlier +EV-pick experiment
Below is the full result history from when we tested publishing +EV betting picks. We've since found the playable market for our users (~2 GGL-licensed sportsbooks) is too thin to sustain a betting edge, so we repositioned to analytics. We keep every result here — wins, losses, and the finding itself — because deleting losers is what tipsters do. It is NOT how we measure the tool (see model accuracy above), and it is reported as independent decisions, not per-book rows.
Equity curve · All time
+26.32u cumulative
Each point is a settled pick's contribution to cumulative net profit in stake units. Wins lift the line, losses drop it. No deletions, no smoothing, no cherry-picking.
Last updated:
Track record builds with each settled pick — current depth: n=1486.
Lock-in significance threshold: 1500 picks. We publish every result regardless of sample size — the receipts are the product.
Returns · live from the ledger
n=1486· early-stage data7-day ROI
+7.5%
478 settled picks
30-day ROI
+0.7%
1193 settled picks
All-time ROI
+1.4%
1486 settled picks
Longest win run
15
15 settled picks
Longest lose run
22
22 settled picks
Units staked
1919
Profit (u)
+26.32u
Hit rate
41.6%
Avg odds
3.29
Avg CLV vs close
−6.9%
our honest edge metric · n=1387 · 12% beat close
Per-sport models
ROI by sport — every model in public.
Each row is the cumulative ROI of every settled pick for that sport. No cherry-picking — losing models are visible too.
Football (Soccer)
n=857 · 34.0% win
+3.6%
Basketball
n=358 · 58.0% win
+3.4%
Baseball
n=259 · 45.2% win
−10.7%
Ice Hockey
n=12 · 41.7% win
−22.3%
Archive note: rows are logged per (match × selection × bookmaker), so the same decision often appears at several books. The honest count is independent decisions, not rows — and most of these book-prices were never playable for a DE user in the first place. Kept in full for transparency.
| Date | Match | Pick | Odds | Stake | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | away Marathonbet | 1.78 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | away NordicBet | 1.78 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home Smarkets | 2.06 | 2u | won+2.12u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | draw Matchbook | 3.90 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | home Marathonbet | 4.85 | 3u | lost-3.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | draw Matchbook | 4.30 | 1u | won+3.30u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | away Ladbrokes | 1.80 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | away Smarkets | 1.78 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | home Matchbook | 4.50 | 3u | lost-3.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | draw Smarkets | 3.75 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | home Matchbook | 1.44 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | away Matchbook | 3.20 | 1u | won+2.20u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | away Coral | 1.80 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | away Ladbrokes AU | 1.80 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | draw Betfair | 3.90 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | home Unibet | 4.35 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home DraftKings | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | home Smarkets | 4.40 | 2u | lost-2.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home Betr AU | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | draw NordicBet | 3.75 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home BetMGM | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | away Matchbook | 3.70 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home Unibet | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | draw Smarkets | 4.30 | 1u | won+3.30u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home NordicBet | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home Sportsbet AU | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | away Betr AU | 3.10 | 1u | won+2.10u |
| 2026-05-20 | Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | away Ladbrokes AU | 3.10 | 1u | won+2.10u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | home Betfair | 4.50 | 3u | lost-3.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | away BetMGM | 1.80 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | away Betfair | 3.70 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | away TAB AU | 3.10 | 1u | won+2.10u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home Paddy Power | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | away Matchbook | 1.79 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | away Ladbrokes | 3.20 | 2u | won+4.40u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home Coral | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home Marathonbet | 2.02 | 1u | won+1.02u |
| 2026-05-20 | Bournemouth vs Manchester City Football (Soccer) | draw Betfair | 4.40 | 2u | won+6.80u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home William Hill | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | away Sportsbet AU | 4.00 | 2u | lost-2.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | away Smarkets | 3.20 | 1u | won+2.20u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | draw Coral | 3.80 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home Betsson | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home Sky Bet | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | away Marathonbet | 3.66 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | away DraftKings | 3.15 | 2u | won+4.30u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | away Smarkets | 4.10 | 3u | lost-3.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home Betway | 2.00 | 1u | won+1.00u |
| 2026-05-20 | Chelsea vs Tottenham Hotspur Football (Soccer) | home Matchbook | 2.10 | 3u | won+3.30u |
| 2026-05-20 | Oklahoma City Thunder vs San Antonio Spurs Basketball | home Betfair | 1.44 | 1u | lost-1.00u |
Methodology
How we measure accuracy (calibration + CLV)
Our headline metric is calibration: across our settled predictions, does an outcome we put at probability p actually happen about p of the time? We publish the calibration curve (predicted vs actual) and a Brier score tested against the base-rate baseline, with a statistical-significance gate. It measures accuracy, not profit.
We also show Closing Line Value (CLV) honestly — how our published odds compared to the market's de-vigged close, including when it is negative. Formula: CLV% = (published_odds / closing_odds − 1) × 100
CLV is a transparency receipt from our retired +EV experiment, not a current edge claim: the playable market proved too thin to beat the closing line, so we dropped the profit framing and kept the numbers visible anyway.
Settlement rules
Each pick is settled against one of four outcomes: Won, Lost, Push, or Void.
- Won: Selection correct. Profit = (odds − 1) × stake.
- Lost: Selection incorrect. Profit = −stake (full loss).
- Push: Bet cancelled by bookmaker (e.g. Asian handicap half). Stake refunded. Profit = 0 units.
- Void: Match abandoned or selection suspended. Stake refunded. Profit = 0 units.
The pick_results table is database-enforced append-only — UPDATE and DELETE are blocked at the database level, so a settled result cannot be silently amended or removed after the fact.
All profit/loss figures use the tax-neutral formula. If a jurisdiction-specific adjustment applies it appears in the pick's audit page under “Edge (post-tax).”
Sample-size caveat
Statistical significance in sports betting requires a large sample. The conventional threshold for drawing firm conclusions is ~1,500 settled picks — at that depth, a consistently positive ROI is extremely unlikely to be variance alone.
BetEdge launched in May 2026 with a baseline of ~293 free picks. Every result is published regardless of sample depth — the receipts are the product. The n= · early-stage data chip on the dashboard is the honest signal: “real numbers, but interpret ROI with an appropriate confidence interval.”
Lock-in threshold: 1,500 picks. The chip disappears once that milestone is crossed. We do not cherry-pick which results to show.
FAQ
About the track record
How is ROI calculated?
What is CLV?
Why does the chart show negative returns sometimes?
What counts as a settled pick?
How do I know these numbers aren't cherry-picked?
BetEdge is an analytics and decision-support tool — not a bookmaker and not a tipster service. We don't accept bets or hold funds. For educational and informational purposes only. 18+.